Atto Jackline V Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 146 2004)
The full judgment
Read the complete, verbatim text of this judgment.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions — always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against conviction and the death sentence for murder. It held that the defence of provocation failed because there was an eleven-hour cooling-off period between the appellant's exchange with the victim's father and the killing, and her conduct was systematic and premeditated. Verbal insults from third parties would not cause an ordinary person to kill an innocent five-year-old who had not provoked her. Malice aforethought was established by the appellant's knowledge that strangling and throwing the child into a latrine would cause death, accompanied by indifference. The claim of minority was unsubstantiated. The death penalty was upheld.
Facts
The appellant and the victim's father, PW3, were former lovers with a history of disputes over pregnancy, maintenance and a defilement charge. On the day of the incident the appellant threatened to do something to PW3 that he would never forget. Eleven hours later she had a girl sent to collect five-year-old Tracy from her nursery school. She took the child to her home, tied her neck with a handkerchief, stuffed sanitary pads into her mouth, strangled her and threw her into a pit latrine, where the body was found naked with a cervical fracture and swollen eyeballs. Death was due to strangulation. The victim's clothes were recovered hidden in a cupboard at the appellant's home, leading to her arrest. She admitted the killing but raised provocation, attributing her actions to ill-treatment and insults from PW3 and his family. Her two sisters, initially indicted, were discharged for lack of a prima facie case.
Issues
- Whether the defence of provocation was available to the appellant so as to reduce murder to manslaughter.
- Whether the trial judge adequately evaluated the evidence in finding malice aforethought.
- Whether the appellant was a minor at the time of the offence such that a death sentence was inappropriate.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Conviction and death sentence of the High Court upheld.
Key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
- Penal Code Act s.188
- Penal Code Act s.189
- Penal Code Act s.191
- Penal Code Act s.192
- Penal Code Act s.193