Wakilii

Akampumuza v Makerere University Business School & 2 Ors (Civil Application No. 275 of 2015)

Court of Appeal · [2016] UGCA 47 · 2016 Application Granted ✦ AI-generated summary ↓ Download
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for an interim order to stay proceedings in pending applications before the Court of Appeal
Decision
Interim order granted staying proceedings in Civil Applications Nos. 263 and 264 of 2015 pending disposal of Civil Application No. 274 of 2015

The full judgment

Read the complete, verbatim text of this judgment.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions — always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The single Justice granted the applicant's request for an interim order staying proceedings in Civil Applications Nos. 263 and 264 of 2015 pending disposal of the applicant's substantive Civil Application No. 274 of 2015. The Court found the applicant had shown a prima facie case with a probability of success in the substantive application, that continued delay in the underlying High Court judicial review (Miscellaneous Cause No. 310 of 2013) was likely to cause irreparable loss not compensable in damages because the second and third respondents might leave the first respondent's employment, and that the balance of convenience favoured staying the applications to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. Costs to abide the outcome of Civil Application No. 274 of 2015.

Facts

The applicant had brought a judicial review application (High Court Miscellaneous Cause No. 310 of 2013) against the respondents concerning acts of the second and third respondents, staff of the first respondent, that adversely affected the applicant's interests. During the hearing, the trial Judge allowed the respondents to raise preliminary points of law in their final written submissions rather than as a separate hearing, and refused them leave to appeal that direction. The respondents then lodged Civil Applications Nos. 263, 264 and 265 of 2015 in the Court of Appeal seeking leave to appeal and stays of proceedings. Application No. 265 of 2015 was earlier dismissed. The applicant filed Civil Application No. 274 of 2015 to strike out the respondents' applications and sought the present interim order to stay Applications Nos. 263 and 264 of 2015 pending its disposal, arguing the respondents were abusing court process to delay the judicial review until the second and third respondents left employment.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant satisfied the conditions for the grant of an interim order staying proceedings in Civil Applications Nos. 263 and 264 of 2015 pending disposal of the applicant's substantive Civil Application No. 274 of 2015.

Orders

  • Application allowed.
  • An interim order issued staying the proceedings in Civil Applications Nos. 263 of 2015 and 264 of 2015 pending disposal of the applicant's Civil Application No. 274 of 2015.
  • The Registrar to summon the parties to Civil Application No. 274 of 2015 to fix a hearing date for its disposal as quickly as the Court calendar permits.
  • Costs of this application to abide the outcome of Civil Application No. 274 of 2015.

Key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Interim Order Staying Proceedings — Conditions for Grant
An interim order staying proceedings may be granted where the applicant shows a prima facie case with a probability of success in the substantive application, that the applicant is likely to suffer irreparable loss not adequately compensable in damages, and that the balance of convenience favours the grant.
Civil Procedure — Stay of Proceedings — Avoidance of Multiplicity of Proceedings
Where the balance of convenience favours stopping multiplicity of court proceedings and decisions, a court may stay the hearing of applications pending the disposal of a substantive application that questions their legitimacy.
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.