Mawangala and 2 Others v Kalule (Civil Application 1008 of 2023)
The full judgment
Read the complete, verbatim text of this judgment.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions — always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court of Appeal granted an application to appoint an administrator ad litem under section 222 of the Succession Act to represent the estate of the deceased respondent in a pending application for a certificate of importance. The court held that the pending Civil Application No. 229 of 2017 qualified as the pending suit, that the deceased's death was sufficiently proved despite the absence of a death certificate, and that those entitled to administration were unwilling to act nearly four years after his death. Invoking section 222 and the court's inherent powers, it appointed the deceased's daughter, the registered owner of most of the disputed land, as administrator ad litem strictly limited to defending the pending application and intended appeal.
Facts
The dispute concerned land at Kyadondo Block 230 Plot 35 originally belonging to the late Daudi Banalekaki, who had permitted George William Kalule to occupy it. The Administrator General distributed the deceased's estate, allocating shares to his widow and three sons including Kalule. Kalule disputed the distribution, lost in the Chief Magistrate's Court of Mengo and on appeal to the High Court, but succeeded on appeal to the Court of Appeal, which held that the deceased had made a gift inter vivos to him and set aside the Administrator General's distribution. The applicants, who had been substituted for two deceased original respondents, sought a certificate of importance to appeal to the Supreme Court. Kalule died on 21 November 2020, and no grant of administration over his estate had been taken out. The applicants applied to appoint Kalule's daughter, Ms. Nakiranda Hellen, into whose names most of the land had been transferred and subdivided, as administrator ad litem to represent his estate in the pending proceedings.
Issues
- Whether the conditions for appointing an administrator ad litem under section 222 of the Succession Act were satisfied so as to appoint a representative of the deceased respondent's estate.
- Whether the pending Civil Application No. 229 of 2017 qualified as the pending suit envisaged by section 222 of the Succession Act.
Orders
- Ms. Nakiranda Hellen is appointed an administrator ad litem in respect of the estate of the late George William Kalule for the purpose of responding to, or defending Civil Application No. 299 of 2017 now pending before this Court.
- Summons/notice of hearing shall issue against Ms. Nakiranda Hellen in that respect.
- The applicants shall meet the costs of this application.
Key headnotes
Legislation cited (6)
- Succession Act s.222
- Judicature Act s.12
- Judicature (Court of Appeal Rules) Directions r.2
- Judicature (Court of Appeal Rules) Directions r.43
- Judicature (Court of Appeal Rules) Directions r.44
- Judicature (Court of Appeal Rules) Directions r.2(2)
Cases cited (3)
- Byomuhangi Christopher v Rugumya Jones (Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 27 of 2023)
- Winrose Emmah Ndinda Kiamba v Agnes Nthambi Kasyoka [2021] eKLR
- Mckag uersus MK Nasb 97 Tem 236 S.I,y.A. 7O9, 7896