George Owor v Attorney General & Anor (Constitutional Petition No. 38 of 2010)
The full judgment
Read the complete, verbatim text of this judgment.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions — always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court held the petition raised genuine issues for constitutional interpretation and succeeded on all grounds. An MP elected on a political party ticket who joins another party, or an Independent who joins a party, must vacate the seat under Article 83(1)(g) and (h); such a member cannot validly be nominated on a party ticket without first resigning. These provisions are a legitimate derogation, within Article 43 limits, of the freedom of association (Article 29(1)(e)) and the right to stand independently (Article 72(4)). The 2nd respondent, an Independent who sought NRM nomination without resigning, made an invalid nomination and is deemed to have vacated his seat from the date of nomination.
Facts
The 2nd respondent withdrew his NRM party membership in January 2006 and returned his membership card, then stood and was elected to the 8th Parliament as an Independent member for West Budama North Constituency. He did not resign that seat. In August 2010, while still sitting as an Independent member, he offered himself for nomination on the NRM ticket to contest as a Member of Parliament in the 9th Parliament and was nominated as the NRM flag bearer in the same constituency. The petitioner, a Ugandan citizen, challenged the constitutionality of the 2nd respondent's nomination and his continued sitting in Parliament, contending these acts contravened Article 83 and other provisions of the Constitution. The respondents denied liability and argued the petition raised no issues for constitutional interpretation.
Issues
- Whether the petition raises issues for constitutional interpretation.
- Whether the 2nd respondent contesting in NRM party primary elections, having been elected as an Independent Member of Parliament, contravenes the Constitution.
- Whether the 2nd respondent continuing to sit in Parliament as an Independent member, having joined the NRM political party, contravenes the Constitution.
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to the remedies prayed for.
Orders
- The petition succeeds on all four issues.
- The petitioner is entitled to all the prayers contained in paragraph 4 of the petition.
- The Registrar is directed to serve a copy of the judgment on the Hon. Speaker of Parliament and the Chairman of the Electoral Commission to take appropriate action.
Key headnotes
Legislation cited (7)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 art.137(3)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 art.83(1)(g)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 art.83(1)(h)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 art.72(4)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 art.43
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 art.29(1)(e)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 art.86
Cases cited (5)
- Baku Raphael Abudra and Abiga Kania v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 1 of 2003)
- Attorney General v Tinyefuza (Constitutional Appeal No. 1 of 1997)
- Serugo v Kampala City Council (Constitutional Appeal No. 2 of 1998)
- Nakachwa Joyce v Attorney General and 2 Others (Constitutional Petition No. 2 of 2001)
- Isha Otto Awizi v Betty Amongi and 26 Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 134 of 2010)