Wakilii

Hits House General Enterprises v Uganda Revenue Authority and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 490 of 2026)

High Court · [2026] UGCOMMC 275 · 2026 Application Dismissed ✦ AI-generated summary ↓ Download
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for discovery arising from civil suit
Decision
Application dismissed as res judicata; 2nd respondent directed to comply fully with earlier discovery order

The full judgment

Read the complete, verbatim text of this judgment.

Sign in to read the full judgment

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions — always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The court held that the application was res judicata as the matter had been determined in Miscellaneous Application No. 2776 of 2023, which ordered discovery of tax returns for 2015 to 2021. The court found that the 2nd respondent had selectively complied by uploading only income tax returns. The term 'tax returns' under Schedule 3 of the Tax Procedure Code Act includes value added tax returns, income tax returns, withholding tax returns, excise duty returns, and other specified returns. The 2nd respondent was directed to upload all tax returns in accordance with the earlier court order.

Facts

The applicant sought an order directing the 1st respondent to make discovery on oath of copies of value added tax returns filed by the 2nd respondent from 2015 to 2021. The 1st respondent argued that the documents were confidential and that the 2nd respondent could produce them directly. The 2nd respondent contended that the application was res judicata as it had been determined in Miscellaneous Application No. 2776 of 2023, and that it had complied by filing tax returns on ECCMIS. The court found that in the earlier application, it had ordered discovery of tax returns for 2015 to 2021, but the 2nd respondent had only uploaded income tax returns, not all categories of tax returns as defined in the Tax Procedure Code Act.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant is entitled to an order for discovery of value added tax returns filed by the 2nd respondent with the 1st respondent from 2015 to 2021.
  2. Whether the application is res judicata having been determined in Miscellaneous Application No. 2776 of 2023.

Orders

  • The 2nd respondent is directed to upload its tax returns in accordance with the court order.
  • Costs shall be in the cause.

Key headnotes

Discovery — Res Judicata — Scope of Earlier Discovery Order
Where a court has ordered discovery of 'tax returns' without specifying particular categories, the term encompasses all types of tax returns defined under Schedule 3 of the Tax Procedure Code Act, including value added tax returns, income tax returns, withholding tax returns, excise duty returns, and other specified returns.
Discovery — Prerequisites for Order
An order for discovery can only be made where there is sufficient evidence that the documents exist and have not been disclosed, the documents relate to the matter in issue in the action, and there is sufficient evidence that the documents are in the possession, custody or power of the other party.
Res Judicata — Application to Discovery Orders
An application for discovery is res judicata where the same relief has been sought and determined in a former application between the same parties, and the doctrine prevents re-litigation of matters directly and substantially in issue that have been heard and finally decided by a competent court.

Legislation cited (8)

  • Evidence Act s.32
  • Judicature Act s.33
  • Civil Procedure Rules Order 10 rule 12
  • Civil Procedure Rules Order 10 rule 14
  • Civil Procedure Rules Order 10 rule 24
  • Tax Procedure Code Act Schedule 3
  • Civil Procedure Act s.7
  • Lotteries and Gaming Act s.50

Cases cited (4)

  • Dresdner Bank Aktiengesellschaft v Sango Bay Estate and Others [1971] HCB 80
  • Kenyi Juma v Grindlays Bank (U) Ltd [1982] HCB 116
  • Taj Deen v Dobrosklonky [1957] EA 379
  • Olouch v Charagu [2003] 2 EA 652
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.