Wakilii

In Re Application for recusal of Hon. Justice Alfonse Chigamoy Owiny-Dollo - CJ (Miscellaneous Application 3 of 2021)

Supreme Court · [2021] UGSC 67 · 2021 Application Dismissed ✦ AI-generated summary ↓ Download
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Ex parte application by notice of motion seeking the recusal of the Chief Justice from a presidential election petition
Decision
Application for recusal dismissed; the Chief Justice continued to sit and the impugned rulings and proceedings were left undisturbed.

The full judgment

Read the complete, verbatim text of this judgment.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions — always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The applicant sought, ex parte, an order disqualifying the Chief Justice from hearing the presidential election petition and the setting aside of an earlier ruling and proceedings in which the Chief Justice had participated. The Chief Justice declined to recuse himself and continued to sit as a member and head of the coram. The Court held that recusal is not a coram decision but is personal to the Justice whose recusal is sought; that response disposed of the first order sought. With the coram remaining intact and no valid grounds shown to disturb the impugned rulings, the Court deemed the remaining two orders moot and dismissed the application.

Facts

The applicant, Male H. Mabirizi K. Kiwanuka, filed an ex parte notice of motion in connection with Presidential Election Petition No. 1 of 2021 between Kyagulanyi Ssentamu Robert and Yoweri Museveni Tibuhaburwa, the Electoral Commission and the Attorney General. He sought an order that the Chief Justice, Hon. Justice Owiny-Dollo, disqualify or recuse himself from hearing the petition. He further sought that the ruling in Miscellaneous Application No. 1 of 2021, and the proceedings of 9 and 11 February 2021, in which the Chief Justice had participated, be set aside as null and void or nullified. The applicant addressed the Court, as constituted, on the recusal sought in the first order. The Chief Justice declined to recuse himself, for reasons later stated in his ruling, and continued to sit as a member and head of the coram.

Issues

  1. Whether the Chief Justice should recuse himself from hearing and determining the presidential election petition.
  2. Whether the ruling in Miscellaneous Application No. 1 of 2021 and the proceedings of 9 and 11 February 2021, in which the Chief Justice participated, should be set aside or nullified.

Orders

  • Application dismissed.

Key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Recusal of Judicial Officer — Decision Personal to the Judge
An application for the recusal of a judge is not determined by the coram as a collective decision; it is personal to the Justice whose recusal is sought and is for that Justice to decide.
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.