Wakilii

Twinomuhangi Dominic v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 2022)

Supreme Court · [2025] UGSC 40 · 2025 Appeal Dismissed ✦ AI-generated summary ↓ Download
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Second criminal appeal from Court of Appeal decision upholding a High Court murder conviction and 30-year sentence
Decision
Appeal dismissed; conviction for murder and the 30-year sentence stand.

The full judgment

Read the complete, verbatim text of this judgment.

Sign in to read the full judgment
Cited — treatment unverified cited in 2 (treatment unverified) Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions — always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

On a second appeal against a murder conviction and 30-year sentence, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. The conviction ground was incompetent because the appellant had abandoned all conviction grounds and obtained leave to appeal sentence only before the Court of Appeal; a ground not raised before the first appellate court cannot be raised before the Supreme Court. The sentence ground was barred by section 5(3) of the Judicature Act, which limits the Court to matters of law, not severity. The Court held the sentence was not illegal: the Prisons Act is administrative and does not prescribe sentences, and sentences exceeding 20 years for capital offences are lawful as they do not exceed the maximum penalty of death.

Facts

On the night of 29 July 2012 at Kabahangara Cell, Karubanda Ward, Kabale Municipality, the appellant got into a fight with his wife, Asasira Rose, which led to her death. The following morning the appellant reported himself to Kabale Police Station, and the deceased's body was found lying in a pool of blood in their home. The appellant was tried in the High Court (Criminal Case No. 22 of 2013), convicted of murder, and sentenced to 35 years' imprisonment, reduced to 30 years after deducting 5 years spent on remand. He appealed to the Court of Appeal against conviction and sentence but, at the hearing, sought and obtained leave to appeal against sentence only; the Court of Appeal upheld the sentence. He then appealed to the Supreme Court against both conviction and sentence.

Issues

  1. Whether a ground of appeal against conviction abandoned before the first appellate court can be raised before the Supreme Court on a second appeal.
  2. Whether the Supreme Court may entertain an appeal against the severity of a sentence given the restriction in section 5(3) of the Judicature Act.
  3. Whether a 35-year (reduced to 30-year) sentence for murder was illegal as exceeding the maximum imprisonment term under the Prisons Act.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.

Key headnotes

Criminal Procedure — Second Appeals — Grounds Not Raised Before the First Appellate Court
A ground of appeal not raised before, and therefore not considered by, the first appellate court is not maintainable before the Supreme Court as a second appellate court, and the Justices of Appeal cannot be faulted for not addressing a complaint never put to them.
Criminal Procedure — Appeals Against Sentence — Jurisdiction Under Section 5(3) of the Judicature Act
On an appeal against sentence the Supreme Court is restricted by section 5(3) of the Judicature Act to matters of law and cannot entertain a complaint directed at the severity or harshness of the sentence.
Sentencing — Legality of Sentence — Prisons Act as an Administrative Statute
The Prisons Act is an administrative statute concerned with the organisation and functions of the prisons service and does not prescribe sentences; sentences for offences are contained in the Penal Code and other penal statutes, and a sentence exceeding 20 years for a capital offence is not illegal because it does not exceed the maximum penalty of death.

Legislation cited (7)

  • Penal Code Act s.188
  • Penal Code Act s.189
  • Penal Code Act s.171
  • Penal Code Act s.172
  • Prisons Act s.35
  • Judicature Act s.5(3)
  • Constitution (Sentencing Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions, Third Schedule, Part I, Guideline 19

Cases cited (7)

  • Woolmington v DPP [1935] AC 462
  • Nannyonjo Harriet & Anor v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 2002)
  • Sekajja Fred v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 78 of 2020)
  • Karisa Moses v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 23 of 2016)
  • Ssenkungu Akim v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 161 of 2023)
  • Tigo Stephen v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 8 of 2009)
  • Okello Geoffrey v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 2014)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.