Wakilii
HomeKnowledgeChecklists › Objecting to a URA tax assessment in Uganda: checklist

Objecting to a URA tax assessment in Uganda: checklist

Checklist Free Tax disputes Updated 9 June 2026 AI-generated
Pending verification: The exact current objection period and any deposit required on appeal. Treat the flagged points as provisional and confirm them before relying on them.

In brief

If you disagree with a URA assessment, you must object in writing within the statutory window. This checklist covers the objection and the next step.

Who it's for & when to use it

Who it's for: Taxpayers and their advisers.

When to use it: After receiving an assessment you wish to dispute.

When not to use it: As a substitute for paying any undisputed tax.

The checklist

1. Read the assessment

  • Read the assessment and identify exactly what is wrong (income included, deductions disallowed, computation, rate).
  • Note the date of service and the objection deadline.

2. Object in time

  • Lodge a written objection within the statutory period of the assessment, stating the grounds precisely (Tax Procedures Code Act s.26).
  • Pay or arrange the portion of tax not in dispute — a condition of a valid objection.

3. Engage and await the decision

  • Respond to URA queries and provide the supporting documents; URA issues an objection decision (s.26).

4. Escalate if needed

  • If dissatisfied, apply to the Tax Appeals Tribunal within its time limit (Tax Appeals Tribunals Act s.14).

Key authorities

  • Tax Procedures Code Act, Cap. 343 (2023 Revision) — ss.26, 27.
  • Tax Appeals Tribunals Act, Cap. 341 (2023 Revision) — s.14.
Checklist · Tax disputes. Actively maintained. Last reviewed 9 June 2026; next review due 9 June 2027. This resource is a practitioner orientation and general information, not legal advice, and does not create an advocate–client relationship. It is AI-generated. Ugandan law changes and chapter and section numbers were revised in the 2023 Laws of Uganda. Verify every statute, rule, form, fee and authority against the current primary source — and the specific facts of your matter — before relying on it.