A. K. P. M. Lutaaya v Attorney General (Civil Reference 1 of 2007)
Cited — treatment unverified
cited in 1 (treatment unverified)
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that a reference under Rule 52 must be made orally or in writing on the existing record, and a judge who strikes out an incompetent application is not functus officio.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how A. K. P. M. Lutaaya applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.