Ababou v People's Democratic Republic of Algeria (Application No. 002-2011)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights held that it lacked jurisdiction to receive an application filed directly by an individual against Algeria because Algeria had not made the special declaration required under Article 34(6) of the Protocol accepting the Court's competence to receive cases under Article 5(3). Direct access by individuals is conditional upon such a declaration. The Court transferred the case to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights.
Outcome
Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and matter transferred to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights
Facts
On 20 February 2011, Soufiane Ababou, an Algerian national residing in Algeria, filed an application with the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights against Algeria concerning his forceful conscription into the Algerian army. He acted through his representative, Youssef Ababou. The Registry acknowledged receipt on 18 March 2011 and requested additional documentation. On 25 March 2011, the applicant submitted a signed copy and information on exhaustion of local remedies. The Court inquired whether Algeria had made the declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol accepting the Court's competence to receive applications directly from individuals. On 13 June 2011, the Legal Counsel of the African Union Commission confirmed that Algeria had not made such a declaration.
Issues
- Whether the Court has jurisdiction to receive an application directly from an individual against a State Party that has not made a declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol accepting the Court's competence to receive such cases.
Orders
- Application declared inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction.
- Case transferred to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights in accordance with Article 6(3) of the Protocol.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (7)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 5(3)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 6(3)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 22
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 34(6)
- Rules of Court Rule 8(2)
- Rules of Court Article 34(1)(2)
- Rules of Court Article 34(4)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.