Abdurahim and Others v Khimji (C.C. 112-1929 (Msa.).)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that under Order 6 Rules 1 and 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1927, pleadings need only contain material facts, not evidence. Making copies of promissory notes for attachment to the plaint was wholly unnecessary where the pleading need only state the effect of the document. The costs on these items were disallowed.
Outcome
Defendant's application to disallow certain cost items granted
Facts
The plaintiffs had sued on promissory notes. After taxation of costs by the Registrar, the defendant applied to disallow multiple items from the plaintiffs' bill of costs relating to making copies of promissory notes for attaching to the plaint. The defendant argued that under the Civil Procedure Rules 1927, specifically Order 6 Rules 1 and 11, such copies were unnecessary as pleadings need only contain material facts and the effect of documents, not the documents themselves or evidence.
Issues
- Whether the costs of making copies of promissory notes for attaching to the plaint should be allowed under the Civil Procedure Rules 1927.
Orders
- Application granted.
- Items 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23 and 24 from the plaintiffs' bill of costs disallowed.
- Costs of the application awarded to the defendant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- Civil Procedure Rules 1927 Order 6 Rule 1
- Civil Procedure Rules 1927 Order 6 Rule 11
Cases cited (1)
- Williams v Wilcox (1838) 8 Ad & E 331
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.