Abelle v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 66 of 2016)
Treatment recorded in citing cases
followed in 4
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that Article 23(8) requires courts to consider remand time but not arithmetically, and Rwabugande's deduction rule cannot bind earlier decisions. Appeal dismissed.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Abelle applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.