Adolf Muganga Mbaijana(Executor of the Estate of the Late Edward Mbaijana) v Emmanuel Basaliza (Miscellaneous Application 2 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
An executor granted probate steps into the shoes of the deceased and may be substituted as a party in pending proceedings where the deceased was party. Where a sole defendant or plaintiff dies and the cause of action survives, the court shall cause the legal representative to be made a party and proceed with the suit.
Outcome
Applicant substituted as party in place of deceased in underlying civil suit and appeal; proceedings to continue with executor as party
Facts
The respondent had instituted Civil Suit No. 022 of 2012 against Edward Mbaijana, which was dismissed with costs to Edward Mbaijana. The respondent filed Civil Appeal No. 002 of 2013, which was also dismissed with costs. Edward Mbaijana died before execution of the costs orders in both matters. On 13 October 2020, the applicant was granted probate in HCT-01-FD-AC-008 of 2018 to administer Edward Mbaijana's estate. The applicant applied to be substituted as a party in the civil suit and appeal to enable execution of the costs orders. The respondent was served but did not file a reply.
Issues
- Whether the applicant should be substituted as a party to Civil Suit No. 022 of 2012 and Civil Appeal No. 002 of 2013 to replace the late Edward Mbaijana.
Orders
- Application allowed.
- Applicant added as a party to Civil Suit No. 022 of 2012 and Civil Appeal No. 002 of 2013.
- Edward Mbaijana (deceased) replaced by the applicant in both suits.
- Necessary changes to be made in the pleadings.
- Costs of the application to be borne by the applicant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (7)
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Civil Procedure Rules O.24 r.3(1)
- Civil Procedure Rules O.24 r.4(1)
- Civil Procedure Rules O.24 r.4(2)
- Civil Procedure Rules O.24 r.10
- Civil Procedure Rules O.24 r.12
- Succession Act s.186
Cases cited (1)
- Amrit Goyal v Hari Chand Goyal & 3 Others (Civil Application No. 109 of 2004)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.