Adrapi v Drito and Ors (Consitutional Petition No. 9 of 2013)
Cited — treatment unverified
cited in 1 (treatment unverified)
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that the Constitutional Court lacked jurisdiction over a disguised election petition raising no question of constitutional interpretation under Article 137.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Adrapi applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.