Africa Institute for Energy and Governance (AFIEGO) and Another v National Environmental Management Authority and Another (Consolidated Miscellaneous Cause No 140 & 141 of 2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court held that the judicial review application was amenable to review as NEMA and PAU are public bodies subject to judicial review, and the applicants had exhausted internal remedies. However, the court found that the appointment of Dr. Kabagambe Kalisa as presiding officer of the public hearing did not violate Guideline 5(3) of the EIA Public Guidelines since he was not an employee of the developers, lead agency, or NEMA. The court further held that no statutory 21-day notice requirement existed for public hearings, and the applicants failed to substantiate their allegations of bias or procedural impropriety. The application was dismissed with costs.
Outcome
Applications dismissed with costs to the respondents.
Facts
Total Exploration & Production Uganda B.V and Tullow Uganda Operations PTY Ltd developed an environmental and social impact assessment (ESIA) for the Tilenga Oil Project in Murchison Falls National Park and Buliisa district. NEMA disseminated the report to lead agencies in June 2018 and convened a technical review in July 2018. After a revised report was submitted in September 2018, NEMA issued public notices in October 2018 inviting comments by 5 November 2018 and scheduled public hearings for 12 and 15 November 2018 in Buliisa and Nwoya. The applicants attended both hearings. Dr. Kabagambe Kalisa, former Permanent Secretary at the Ministry of Energy and current Senior Presidential Advisor on Oil and Gas, presided over the hearings. The applicants complained about his appointment, alleged insufficient notice, and claimed they were denied adequate presentation time. NEMA approved the ESIA on 15 April 2019. The applicants filed these consolidated applications on 15 May 2019 seeking certiorari to quash the approval and prohibition against acting on it.
Issues
- Whether the instant application is amenable to judicial review.
- What are the remedies available.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the respondents.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (17)
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda Art.42
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda Art.50
- Judicature Act Cap.13 s.33
- Judicature Act Cap.13 s.36
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- National Environment Act s.113(1)
- National Environment Act s.140(1)
- National Environment Act s.140(2)
- National Environment (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations Reg.19
- National Environment (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations Reg.20
- National Environment (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations Reg.22(1)
- National Environment (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations Reg.22(3)
- National Environment (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations Reg.24
- Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations S.I. No.13/1998 Reg.38
- Environmental Impact Assessment Public Guidelines 1999 Guideline 5(3)
- Environmental Impact Assessment Public Guidelines 1999 Guideline 15(5)
- Employment Act s.2
Cases cited (3)
- Water & Environment Media Network and Others v NEMA and Another (HCMC Nos. 239 & 255 of 2020)
- Mugoya Paul v UBOS (HCMC No. 118 of 2021)
- Republic v Commissioner for Domestic Taxes Ex parte Sony Holdings Limited [2019] EKLR
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.