Wakilii

Africa Legal Aid v the Gambia (Communication 209 of 1997)

African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights · [2000] ACHPR 13 · 2000 Communication Inadmissible AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Communication to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights alleging arbitrary detention and violation of fair trial rights
Decision
Communication dismissed for non-exhaustion of local remedies

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights declared the communication inadmissible for failure to exhaust local remedies as required by Article 56(5) of the African Charter. The complainant alleged arbitrary detention of Mr Lamin Waa Juwara by The Gambia without charge or trial, but the Commission found the requirement for exhaustion of local remedies had not been satisfied.

Outcome

Communication dismissed for non-exhaustion of local remedies

Facts

Africa Legal Aid, an NGO with observer status, submitted a communication on behalf of Mr Lamin Waa Juwara, a Gambian national. Mr Juwara left his house on 1 February 1996 and did not return. His wife learned through newspaper reports the following day that he had been detained. She was told he had been transferred to Upper River Division prison. Mr Juwara had been an independent candidate in legislative elections before the 1994 military coup and had been arrested several times since the coup. The complainant alleged he had not been charged or brought before a court. During the Commission's 23rd Session in April 1998, the Respondent State informed the Commission that Mr Juwara had been released, and the Commission suspended its decision pending verification.

Issues

  1. Whether the communication should be declared admissible despite non-exhaustion of local remedies where the complainant alleges the detainee was never charged or brought before a court.

Orders

  • Communication declared inadmissible.

Rules and key headnotes

Human Rights — Admissibility — Exhaustion of Local Remedies
A communication alleging human rights violations will be declared inadmissible where the complainant has not satisfied the requirement for exhaustion of local remedies as stipulated in Article 56(5) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.

Legislation cited (5)

  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 6
  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 9(1)
  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 9(2)
  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 56(5)
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 5

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Africa Legal Aid v the Gambia (Communication 209 of 1997) [2000] ACHPR 13 (11 May 2000)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.