African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights v Jamhiriya (Application No. 004-2011)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights held that despite the absence of express provision in the Rules of Court for extending time for an applicant's reply, the Court possesses inherent powers to set and extend time limits for submission of pleadings in the interest of justice. The Court granted the Applicant's request for extension of time to file its reply to 30 September 2011.
Outcome
Extension of time granted to Applicant to file reply
Facts
The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights filed an application against Libya on 3 March 2011. The Respondent was served on 22 March 2011 and had 60 days to respond. On 18 April 2011, the Respondent provided names of representatives. On 11 May 2011, the Respondent requested a three-week extension to finalize its response. Before the Court considered this request during its 21st Ordinary Session in June 2011, the Registry received the Respondent's response on 8 June 2011. The Court accepted the extension request retrospectively to 8 June 2011. The Registry transmitted the response to the Applicant on 18 June 2011, directing a reply within 30 days. On 28 June 2011, the Applicant requested extension of time to reply until 30 September 2011.
Issues
- Whether the Court has power to extend time for the Applicant to file its reply to the Respondent's response where the Rules of Court do not provide for such extension.
Orders
- The Applicant's request for extension of time is allowed.
- Time for the Applicant to file its reply is extended to 30 September 2011.
Rules and key headnotes
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.