Ainomugisha v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 188 of 2016)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
A trial judge's failure to personally explain plea-bargain rights does not vitiate a conviction where counsel explained them; lawful custody under Article 23(8) runs from remand, not arrest.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Ainomugisha applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.