Home › Case law › Airtel Uganda Limited v Garfield Spence a.k.a. Konshens & Mtech Limited (Civil Application 458 of 2024)
Airtel Uganda Limited v Garfield Spence a.k.a. Konshens & Mtech Limited (Civil Application 458 of 2024)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
The Court of Appeal's concurrent jurisdiction to stay execution extends to a conditional High Court stay the applicant finds harsh; stay granted pending appeal.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Airtel Uganda Limited applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.