Ajavon v Republic of Benin (Application No. 027-2020)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights found that it had prima facie jurisdiction to hear the request for provisional measures but declared the request moot because the CRIET had already convicted the Applicant and issued an arrest warrant before the Court could rule on the provisional measures application.
Outcome
Request for provisional measures declared moot following conviction by domestic court
Facts
The Applicant, a Beninese national, challenged criminal proceedings brought against him before the Court for the Suppression of Economic Offences and Terrorism (CRIET) for forgery of a public document, abetment of forgery, and fraud. The Investigation Chamber of the CRIET issued judgment on 29 May 2020 partially dismissing his appeal and referring the case to the Appeals Chamber. The Appeals Chamber upheld this judgment on 18 June 2020. The Supreme Court dismissed his appeal in cassation on 29 January 2021. The Applicant filed a request for provisional measures with the African Court seeking a stay of execution of these judgments pending determination of his application on the merits. On 1 March 2021, before the Court ruled on the provisional measures request, the first instance Chamber of the CRIET convicted the Applicant, sentenced him to five years imprisonment and a fine, issued an arrest warrant, and ordered him to pay damages totalling over 140 billion FCFA to the Beninese State.
Issues
- Whether the Court has prima facie jurisdiction to hear the request for provisional measures.
- Whether the request for provisional measures should be granted to stay execution of judgments rendered against the Applicant.
Orders
- Declared that the request for provisional measures is moot.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (11)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 3(1)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 27(2)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 28(7)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 34(6)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 5(3)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 7(1)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 7(1)(a)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 7(1)(c)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 14
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 16
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 18
Cases cited (3)
- Houngue Eric Noudehouenou v Republic of Benin (Application No. 003/2020)
- Komi Koutche v Republic of Benin (Application No. 020/2019)
- Ingabire Victoire Umuhoza v Republic of Rwanda (Jurisdiction)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.