Akampumuza v Attorney General & Ors (Constitutional Application No. 57 of 2010)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that a scheduling conference is not a hearing, so a recusal application for bias was premature and must be raised before the full coram at hearing.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Akampumuza applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.