Akiding and 3 Others v Dheyongera and Another (HCT-00-LD-CS 2243 of 2016)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court held that land gifted by a deceased person to his son during his lifetime does not form part of the deceased's estate and is not available for administration. The administrator's special power of attorney confirmed the gift. The subsequent sale of the gifted land by the son to a third party was lawful. However, where the land occupied by the defendants exceeds the dimensions specified in the sale agreement, the excess land belongs to the estate and must be vacated. Each party to bear own costs.
Outcome
Plaintiffs' suit partially succeeded — defendants to vacate excess land beyond 60 ft x 36 ft; 1st defendant's ownership of 60 ft x 36 ft plot confirmed
Facts
The plaintiffs, widow and children of the late Asukanazi Krisositomu Okia, sought to recover unregistered land at Swara Road, Naguru measuring 60 ft x 36 ft. They claimed the land formed part of the deceased's estate but was unlawfully sold by the 2nd defendant (the deceased's son) to the 1st defendant in 2011. The 2nd defendant claimed his father gifted him the land in 1983, that he settled on it, and that the deceased recognised his interest until his death in 2008. The widow, Alice Okia, was granted letters of administration in 2009. On 10 February 2011, she executed a special power of attorney confirming the 2nd defendant had been given part of the plot by the deceased during his lifetime. The 2nd defendant sold the land (60 ft x 36 ft) to the 1st defendant by agreement dated 18 March 2011. A locus in quo visit revealed the defendants occupied land exceeding the agreed dimensions.
Issues
- Whether the suit property forms part of the estate of the late Asukanazi Krisositomu Okia?
- Whether the transaction of sale of the suit property between the defendants was lawful?
- Whether the 1st defendant is a bona fide purchaser of the suit property?
- What remedies are available to the parties?
Orders
- Plaintiffs declared lawful owners of excess land currently occupied by defendants beyond land measuring 60 ft x 36 ft at Swara Road, Naguru, Katale, Binyonyi Village, Nakawa Division.
- Defendants to vacate the excess land and remove any buildings within 3 months from date of judgment, in default of which they shall be evicted and any illegal buildings demolished in accordance with The Constitution (Land Evictions) (Practice) Directions, 2021.
- Permanent injunction issued restraining defendants, their agents, servants, workmen and all those claiming under them from trespassing, encroaching, interfering with or dealing with the excess land.
- 1st defendant declared lawful owner of land measuring 60 ft x 36 ft at Swara Road, Naguru, Katale, Binyonyi Village, Nakawa Division.
- Each party to bear its own costs of the suit.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Succession Act Cap 162 s.25
- Succession Act Cap 162 s.180
- Constitution (Land Evictions) (Practice) Directions 2021
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.