Akolebirungi Kemigisa Gorret v William George Kawooya and Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 2915 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the applicant established a prima facie case showing fraudulent registration and alienation of her land, and that she would suffer irreparable injury if the respondents continued to sell and develop the suit land. Temporary injunction granted to preserve the status quo pending determination of the main suit.
Outcome
Temporary injunction granted pending determination of the main suit
Facts
The applicant claimed ownership of land comprised in Kyadondo Block 94 Plot 89 at Kata, Nangabo, Wakiso District. She alleged that the 1st respondent fraudulently applied for a special certificate of title on her land and transferred it to the 2nd respondent without her knowledge or consent. She lodged a caveat on 27 June 2019, which was allegedly fraudulently removed by the 1st and 2nd respondents. The Commissioner Land Registration subsequently lodged a caveat stopping fraudulent entries. Despite this, the 4th to 54th respondents were allegedly selling portions of the land and building illegal structures on it. The applicant sought a temporary injunction to restrain further alienation and development pending determination of the main suit for declaration of ownership and cancellation of fraudulent registration.
Issues
- Whether there is a prima facie case with a probability of success.
- Whether the applicant will suffer irreparable injury which would not adequately be compensated by an award of damages.
Orders
- A temporary injunction is issued restraining the Respondents, their agents, servants, assignees, legal representatives or any person acting under them from transacting in, alienating, selling and/or disposing of any portion of the suit land comprised in Kyadondo Block 94 Plot 89 land at Kata, Nangabo, Wakiso District, until the disposal of the main suit.
- Costs shall be in the cause.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
Cases cited (5)
- Kiyimba Kaggwa v Hajji Abdul Nasser Katende (HBC 43 of 1985)
- Jakisa and 2 Others v Kyambogo University (Miscellaneous Application No. 549 of 2013)
- American Cyanamid Company Ltd v Ethicon [1975] All ER 504
- Makune James and 2 Others v Balikarara Joseph and Another (Civil Appeal No. 0091 of 2022)
- Samwiri Mussa v Rose Achen (1978 HCB 297)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.