Akutta Olupots Justine v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 219 of 2012)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that where prosecution proves an accused received public funds and no credible evidence shows lawful disbursement, the burden of proof is discharged without shifting onus to the accused.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Akutta Olupots Justine applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.