Alew v Commissioner Land Registration (Misc. Cause No.026 of 2015)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Application dismissed. The court held that an applicant seeking to compel the Commissioner Land Registration to register a transfer under Section 182(1) RTA must first require the Commissioner to set forth in writing the grounds for refusal before approaching the court. The applicant failed to produce evidence that she had made formal written request for reasons or that the Commissioner had responded. This procedural step is mandatory and cannot be omitted even where proceedings are uncontested.
Outcome
Application dismissed with liberty to follow Section 182(1) RTA procedure
Facts
The applicant purchased land comprised in Kibuga Block 6 Plot 300 at Katwe in 1998 following a public auction advertised by Ume Court Bailiffs & Auctioneers on behalf of Capital Finance Corporation, a mortgagee. She paid UGX 9 million and received the duplicate certificate of title. After obtaining a court order in Mengo Civil Suit No. 954 of 2008, she retrieved the transfer form from the mortgagee's advocate. When she lodged the transfer and release of mortgage for registration with the Commissioner Land Registration, the Commissioner declined registration and requested a copy of the newspaper advertisement of the sale. The applicant and the bailiffs were unable to produce the advertisement due to lapse of time. The applicant had been in uninterrupted possession of the property since 1998. The respondent Commissioner did not file any response and did not attend the hearing despite service.
Issues
- Whether the applicant complied with the procedural requirements under Section 182(1) RTA by requiring the Commissioner to set forth in writing the grounds for refusal to register the transfer.
- Whether the Commissioner's request for production of the newspaper advertisement was a valid exercise of powers under Section 165 RTA.
- Whether the court should order registration of the transfer in the absence of evidence that the statutory procedure under Section 182(1) RTA was followed.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (4)
Cases cited (1)
- Eridad Tito Nsubuga and Another v Attorney General (1997)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.