Alp Investments Limited v Bank of India (U) Limited (Originating Summons 1 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
A mortgagee's sale of mortgaged property without prior service of a notice to sell under Section 26(2) of the Mortgage Act 2009 and without a valuation report as required by Regulation 11 of the Mortgage Regulations 2012 is irregular and illegal and must be set aside, notwithstanding the mortgagor's default or the existence of a court order lifting an injunction upon failure to meet conditions. The statutory procedures for sale are mandatory and cannot be circumvented.
Outcome
Sale set aside; vacant possession ordered to be returned to mortgagor within 30 days
Facts
The plaintiff obtained a USD 1,300,000 credit facility from the defendant bank in 2018, secured by mortgages over two plots on Kanjokya Street, Kampala. The loan became non-performing by November 2022 with an outstanding balance of USD 1,383,559.55. Both parties were sued by third parties in Civil Suit No. 204 of 2023, leading to an injunction restraining dealings in the mortgaged property conditional on the plaintiff depositing 30% of the outstanding amount within 30 days. The plaintiff did not meet the condition. The defendant then took possession of the property on 14 December 2023 and purportedly sold it by public auction in November 2023 to the highest bidder for USD 2,400,000. The plaintiff alleged that by the time of the sale, it had paid the full outstanding amount and that the defendant had conducted the sale without serving a notice to sell or conducting a valuation.
Issues
- Whether the defendant's forceful taking of possession of the mortgaged property on 14 December 2023 without issuance and service to the plaintiff of a notice of entry was irregular and illegal.
- Whether the foreclosure on the mortgaged property without a notice to sell and a valuation report was irregular and illegal and should be set aside.
- Whether the plaintiff should be granted general damages and costs of the suit.
Orders
- The defendant's entry into possession of the mortgaged property on 14 December 2023 without issuance and service to the plaintiff of a notice of entry was declared irregular and illegal.
- The foreclosure on the mortgaged property without a notice to sell and a valuation report was declared irregular and illegal, and is set aside.
- The defendant shall, within 30 days from the date of this ruling, deliver vacant possession of the mortgaged property comprised in FRV 349 Folio 12 Plot 47, Kanjokya Street, Kampala and FRV 349 Folio 7 Plot 49, Kanjokya Street, Kampala to the plaintiff, along with a formal account of the defendant's possession thereof.
- The defendant shall, within 7 days from the date of this ruling, avail to the plaintiff its updated loan account statement and a demand letter, if necessary, raising any and all outstanding monies under the loan.
- Costs of this application are awarded to the plaintiff.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (12)
- Mortgage Act 2009 s.24
- Mortgage Act 2009 s.24(2)(a)
- Mortgage Act 2009 s.26
- Mortgage Act 2009 s.26(2)
- Mortgage Act 2009 s.19
- Mortgage Regulations 2012 reg.11
- Mortgage Regulations 2012 reg.12(3)
- Civil Procedure Act Cap 71 s.98
- Civil Procedure Act Cap 71 s.27(1)
- Civil Procedure Act Cap 71 s.27(2)
- Civil Procedure Rules S.I. 71-1 Order 37 rule 4
- Civil Procedure Rules S.I. 71-1 Order 37 rule 6
Cases cited (6)
- Afro Moto Ltd & 2 Ors v Barclays Bank Uganda Ltd (High Court Civil Suit No. 189 of 2010)
- Mayanja Bosco Kasikururu Lois Okumu & Anor (High Court Originating Summons No. 5 of 2008)
- Nesta Petroleum (U) Ltd v Silcon Oil Ltd & Anor (High Court Originating Summons No. 3 of 2022)
- Gloria Kubajo & Anor v Francis Drate (High Court Civil Suit No. 889 of 2020)
- Guarantee Trust Bank (Uganda) Ltd v Dokwals Uganda Limited & Anor (High Court Civil Suit No. 1 of 2021)
- Uganda Development Bank v Muganga Construction [1981] HCB 35
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.