Amina Rose Nakaye v Haji Juma Achikule (Civil Suit No. 29 of 1993)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the plaintiff validly married the deceased under Islamic law. A widow is the most suitable person to obtain representation to her deceased husband's estate, particularly where children are minors. The defendant's caveat was removed and the plaintiff was granted letters of administration to the estate of the late Juma Yuma alias Mukli, together with quiet possession of the matrimonial home.
Outcome
Plaintiff granted letters of administration and quiet possession of the matrimonial home
Facts
The plaintiff applied for letters of administration to the estate of her late husband Juma Yuma. She had married the deceased under Kiganda customary law and subsequently under Islamic ceremony. They lived together at Jinja Kawempe and she was recognised as his wife. The deceased died on 7 November 1992 at Lacor Hospital in Gulu. After his death, the defendant (the deceased's father) came from Arua with other relatives and occupied the matrimonial home. The defendant forbade the plaintiff, who was in advanced stages of pregnancy, from having any of her relatives around. Efforts by the RCs to arbitrate failed and the plaintiff was forced to seek refuge elsewhere. The defendant lodged a caveat against the grant of letters of administration, averring that the plaintiff was not the wife and had no cause of action in the matter of the estate.
Issues
- Whether the plaintiff was entitled to letters of administration to the estate of the late Juma Yuma
- Whether there was any remedy available to the parties
Orders
- The caveat lodged by the defendant against the plaintiff's application is removed.
- The plaintiff is granted letters of administration to the estate of the late Juma Yuma alias Mukli.
- The plaintiff is entitled to quiet and undisturbed possession of the matrimonial home.
- The plaintiff is awarded costs of the suit.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (4)
- Succession Act Cap 139 s.265
- Customary Marriage Registration Decree, Decree 16 of 1973 s.10
- Marriage and Divorce of Moslems Act Cap 213
- Succession Amendment Decree, Decree 22 of 1972 s.2C
Cases cited (7)
- Uganda v Gabriel Apple (1977) HCB 22
- Spiva v Spivac [1930] All ER 133
- In re Kibiego (1972) EA 179
- Florence Konitungo v Yolamu Katuramu (1992) IV KAL 12
- Erinesti Kabumba and 2 others v Nakasi Kizito (1982) II KAD 75
- Captain Harry Gaudy v Caspair Air Charters Ltd [1956] EACA Vol XXIII 139
- Opika Opoka v Munno Newspapers and another (1988-1990) HCB 51
Cases citing this judgment (1)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.