Amos Sendegeya and Another v Uganda (HCT 05-CR-MA 4 of 2003)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court granted bail to two applicants facing criminal charges. Each applicant was required to deposit UGX 1,000,000 cash with court and produce substantial sureties binding themselves in UGX 15,000,000 each. The applicants were directed to report to Kabale Chief Magistrate's Court on 18 March 2003 for hearing.
Outcome
Applicants admitted to bail subject to conditions
Facts
Two applicants, Amos Sendegeya and Michael Ndemere, applied for bail to the High Court at Mbarara in relation to criminal proceedings pending in Kabale. The court heard submissions from counsel for both sides concerning the bail application.
Issues
- Whether the applicants should be admitted to bail pending trial
Orders
- Each applicant to make a cash deposit of UGX 1,000,000 with court.
- Each surety to bind himself to court in the sum of UGX 15,000,000 (not cash).
- Applicants to report to the Chief Magistrate's Court at Kabale on 18th March 2003 for hearing.
- If applicants fail to fulfil these conditions they will be sent back on remand.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.