Amuge v Obalim (Divorce Cause 1 of 2021)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court granted a decree nisi dissolving the marriage on grounds of desertion by both parties and adultery by the petitioner. Custody of the minor child was awarded to the petitioner with quarterly maintenance of UGX 2,500,000 payable by the respondent. Each party to bear own costs.
Outcome
Marriage dissolved by decree nisi. Petitioner to have custody of child with respondent's visitation rights and maintenance obligation of UGX 10,000,000 per annum.
Facts
The parties married on 18 April 2009 under the Marriage Act Cap. 146 and had one child born in 2011. In 2010 they agreed to sell their matrimonial home in Kitgum and the respondent relocated to Kampala to establish a business. The petitioner did not join him. By 2011 the parties ceased cohabitation and communication. The petitioner entered into a relationship with another man and had two children with him. The respondent alleged adultery; the petitioner alleged adultery, cruelty and desertion by the respondent. The parties lived separately for approximately 12 years before petitioning for divorce in 2021.
Issues
- Whether there are grounds for divorce under the Divorce Act Cap. 144.
- What remedies are available to the parties.
Orders
- Petition granted on the grounds of desertion.
- Cross-petition granted on the grounds of adultery and desertion.
- Decree nisi issued dissolving the marriage between Amuge Salome and Obalim Wilfred Ochola.
- Petitioner granted primary custody of the minor child Mich Trinity Michelle.
- Respondent granted visitation rights at mutually agreed times and places.
- Respondent to pay quarterly maintenance of UGX 2,500,000 (UGX 10,000,000 per annum) for the child's school fees and upkeep.
- Application for non-molestation order declined.
- Each party to bear own costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
Cases cited (4)
- Uganda Association of Women Lawyers v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 2 of 2003)
- [1970] HCB 261
- [1980] HCB 139
- Bishop Kiganda David v Hadija Nasejje Kiganda (Divorce Cause No. 42 of 2011)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.