Anand v Public Trustee of the Colony and Protectorate of Kenya (Civil Case No. 110 of 1942)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
An action for damages for breach of an implied term of a contract of carriage lies against the estate of the deceased contractor. Where a passenger is injured due to breach of the implied undertaking to exercise due care, skill and foresight, the plaintiff is entitled to restitutio in integrum including damages for pain and suffering, loss of earning capacity, and general incapacity, as these arise naturally from the breach.
Outcome
Plaintiff awarded damages totalling Sh. 31,200 comprising medical expenses and damages for pain, suffering, permanent disability, loss of earning capacity and loss of expectation of life
Facts
On 5 March 1941, the plaintiff was a fare-paying passenger in a taxi lorry owned and driven by Chanan Ram, which operated a regular passenger service between Eldoret and Kitale. While being driven from Eldoret to Kitale, the lorry collided with a railway engine at a level crossing approximately three to four miles from Eldoret. The plaintiff was seriously injured in the collision. The owner-driver Chanan Ram was killed in the accident. The plaintiff brought an action in contract against the Public Trustee as administrator of Chanan Ram's estate, claiming damages for breach of the implied term of the contract of carriage to exercise due care, skill and foresight.
Issues
- Whether an action for damages for breach of an implied term of a contract of carriage lies against the estate of a deceased contractor.
- What is the proper measure of damages recoverable for breach of contract of carriage where the breach results in personal injury.
Orders
- Judgment for the plaintiff for Sh. 31,200.
- Costs awarded to the plaintiff.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases cited (2)
- Wilson v New Dock Company (1866) 1 Exch 177
- The Argentino (1888) 13 PD 191
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.