Andrew Kibaya v Uganda (Constitutional Petition No. 28 of 2010)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that a court must make a considered decision that a genuine question of constitutional interpretation has arisen before referring it under Article 137(5).
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Andrew Kibaya applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.