Wakilii

Angela Margaret Itinot and Another v Irimo Gerald and Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 51 of 2025)

High Court · [2025] UGHC 635 · 2025 Application Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for temporary injunction arising from miscellaneous cause
Decision
Application for temporary injunction dismissed; burial of the late Alupo Rose may proceed at the ancestral home of the late Obwangor Joseph Cuthbert

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The court dismissed an application for a temporary injunction to restrain burial of the deceased at her late partner's ancestral home. The court held that a person's place of burial is not determined by the existence of a legal marriage but primarily by the expressed or implied wishes of the deceased and concerned parties. Where the deceased had lived with the late partner for over 20 years without complaint or eviction, and continued to reside in the same home after his death, this evidence sufficiently indicated the known wishes of both deceased persons. The applicants failed to establish a prima facie case warranting restraint of the burial.

Outcome

Application for temporary injunction dismissed; burial of the late Alupo Rose may proceed at the ancestral home of the late Obwangor Joseph Cuthbert

Facts

The applicants are administrators of the estate of the late Obwangor Joseph Cuthbert. They sought to restrain the respondents from burying the late Alupo Rose at the ancestral home of the late Obwangor Joseph, arguing that she was not related to them by blood or marriage. The respondents contended that the late Alupo Rose lived with the late Obwangor Joseph Cuthbert as his wife from 1990 until his death in 2012, and continued to reside in the same house until her own death. The administration of the estate was subject to a separate dispute in the Family Division regarding whether a legal marriage existed between the deceased persons.

Issues

  1. Whether the application discloses sufficient grounds for grant of an order of a temporary injunction?

Orders

  • Application dismissed.
  • Costs of the application to abide the outcome of the main cause.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Temporary Injunctions — Conditions for Grant
For grant of a temporary injunction, an applicant must show a prima facie case with probability of success, that the applicant might otherwise suffer irreparable injury which would not adequately be compensated by damages, and if the court is in doubt, it will decide on the balance of convenience.
Succession & Estates — Burial Rights — Determination of Place of Burial
A person's place of burial is not essentially determined by the nature of biological or marital relationship between concerned parties but is more primarily determined by the expressed or implied wishes of the deceased and the other concerned parties. There is no bar to burial of a person that is biologically unconnected to a family at a family burial ground provided the wishes of that person and of the other family members are known or can be gathered.
Succession & Estates — Wishes of Deceased — Paramount Importance
In matters dealing with estates of deceased persons, the wishes of a deceased person are of paramount importance. The primary consideration for determining place of burial is a combination of the kind of relationship between the deceased persons before death and their known wishes, expressly or impliedly.
Succession & Estates — Burial Rights — Evidence of Implied Wishes
Where a deceased person lived with another deceased person as husband and wife for over 20 years without complaint or eviction, and continued to reside in the same house after the partner's death until her own demise, this evidence is sufficient to indicate prima facie the known wishes of both deceased persons regarding burial at the family home.

Legislation cited (6)

Cases cited (6)

  • Kiyimba Kaggwa v Hajji Abdul Nasser Katende [1985] HCB 43
  • Giella v Cassman Brown & Co. Ltd [1973] 1 EA 358
  • Daniel Mukwaya v Administrator General (HCCS No. 630 of 1993)
  • Erisa Rainbow Musoke v Ahamada Kezala [1987] HCB 81
  • Robert Kavuma v Hotel International (SCCA No. 8 of 1990)
  • Tonny Wasswa v Joseph Kakooza [1987] HCB 79

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Angela Margaret Itinot and Another v Irimo Gerald and Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 51 of 2025) [2025] UGHC 635 (16 June 2025)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.