APDH v Côte d'Ivoire (Application No. 003-2017)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court held it has jurisdiction to interpret its own decisions under Article 28(4) of the Protocol. The Application for interpretation was declared inadmissible because although filed within the 12-month time limit, it failed to specify which points in the operative provisions required interpretation. The questions posed sought advice on implementation rather than clarification of the judgment's meaning or scope, which is the State's responsibility.
Outcome
Application for interpretation declared inadmissible
Facts
On 18 November 2016, the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights delivered a judgment finding that Côte d'Ivoire violated obligations relating to electoral independence and equality. The Court ordered Côte d'Ivoire to amend its Independent Electoral Commission law and report on implementation within one year. On 4 May 2017, Côte d'Ivoire filed an application seeking interpretation of that judgment, requesting guidance on the structure of the new electoral commission, whether constitutional review could guarantee independence, and clarification of laws relating to public freedoms. APDH opposed the application, arguing that none of the questions sought interpretation of the judgment.
Issues
- Whether the Court has jurisdiction to interpret the judgment delivered on 18 November 2016.
- Whether the Application for interpretation is admissible under Rule 66 of the Rules of Court.
- Whether the questions posed by Côte d'Ivoire seek to clarify the meaning or scope of operative provisions of the earlier judgment.
Orders
- Declares that it has jurisdiction to hear the present Application.
- Declares that the Application is inadmissible.
- Rules that each Party shall bear its own Costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 22
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 28(4)
Cases cited (1)
- APDH v Republic of Côte d'Ivoire (Application No. 001-2014)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.