Arab Organisation For Human Rights v Egypt (Communication 244 of 2001)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights took note of the withdrawal of a communication alleging violations of pre-trial rights, fair trial guarantees, freedom of expression, and effective remedies under the African Charter. The withdrawal followed the acquittal of the principal complainant by Egypt's Court of Cassation. The Commission closed the file without determining admissibility or merits.
Outcome
Communication withdrawn by complainant and file closed by the Commission
Facts
The Arab Organisation for Human Rights filed a communication on behalf of Professor Saadeddin Ibrahim and six others who were convicted by Egypt's Supreme Security Court in May 2001 on charges including disseminating damaging information abroad, bribery, receiving unauthorised donations, fraud, and forgery. The complainants alleged violations of pre-trial and trial rights under the African Charter, including prolonged administrative detention without charge, denial of access to counsel, inadequate time to prepare defence, and restricted appeal rights under Egyptian law. During the Commission's consideration of the matter, Egypt's Court of Cassation acquitted Professor Ibrahim. The complainant subsequently withdrew the communication on behalf of all alleged victims.
Orders
- Takes note of the withdrawal of the communication by the Complainant.
- Decides to close the file.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.