Wakilii

Arthur Ssegwanyi v Applied Principles Consulting Ltd (Miscellaneous Cause No. 021 of 2024)

High Court · [2024] UGCOMMC 407 · 2024 Application Granted AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award arising from ICAMEK arbitration proceedings
Decision
Arbitral award recognized and enforced as a decree of the High Court

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The High Court granted the application for recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award issued by ICAMEK on 27 January 2023. The court found that the applicant had complied with all statutory requirements under Sections 35 and 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 2013, the time for setting aside the award had expired, and the respondent had neither objected nor applied to set aside the award. The award was recognized as binding and entered as a decree of court.

Outcome

Arbitral award recognized and enforced as a decree of the High Court

Facts

The applicant commenced arbitration proceedings against the respondent under clauses 13 and 14 of a General Service Agreement dated 16 May 2018 in respect of breach by the respondent. The arbitration was conducted in accordance with the Rules of International Centre for Arbitration and Mediation in Kampala (ICAMEK). An arbitral award was issued in favour of the applicant on 27 January 2023. The time prescribed under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 2013 for the respondent to apply to set aside the award expired. The applicant then applied to the High Court for recognition and enforcement of the award. The respondent did not object to the application nor apply to set aside the award.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant is entitled to recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award dated 27 January 2023.
  2. Whether the requirements under Section 35 and Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 2013 have been satisfied.

Orders

  • Application granted.
  • Arbitral award recognized as binding on the parties as a decree.
  • Award of UGX 25,000,000/= as outstanding balance on contractual sum entered as decree.
  • Interest at 8% per annum from 1 January 2021 to payment in full on UGX 25,000,000/= entered as decree.
  • Award of UGX 5,000,000/= as general damages entered as decree.
  • Cost of arbitration (Arbitrator's fees USD $500.00, ICAMEK's Administrative fees USD $375.00, Filing fees UGX 350,000) entered as decree.
  • Legal costs of the Claimant as agreed by parties or assessed by the Tribunal entered as decree.

Rules and key headnotes

Arbitration & ADR — Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards — Statutory Requirements
An arbitral award shall be recognized as binding and upon application in writing to the court shall be enforced where the applicant furnishes the duly authenticated original arbitral award or a duly certified copy of it and the original arbitration agreement or a duly certified copy of it.
Arbitration & ADR — Enforcement of Awards — Expiry of Time for Setting Aside
Where the time for making an application to set aside the arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 2013 has expired, or that application having been made has been refused, the award shall be enforced in the same manner as if it were a decree of the court.

Legislation cited (3)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Arthur Ssegwanyi v Applied Principles Consulting Ltd (Miscellaneous Cause No. 021 of 2024) [2024] UGCommC 407 (10 December 2024)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.