Asimwe v Attorney General (Civil Suit 1094 of 1988)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that a minor registered as owner of a motor vehicle in violation of the Traffic and Road Safety Act 1970 s.10(2) is nonetheless the owner for purposes of a civil suit for recovery of the vehicle, as the prohibition does not render registration void ab initio but merely voidable. Held further that the defendant is vicariously liable for the wrongful taking of the vehicle by NRA soldiers acting within the scope of their employment. Plaintiff awarded damages comprising vehicle value, lost income, general damages, and interest.
Outcome
Plaintiff's suit allowed. Defendant found vicariously liable for wrongful taking of plaintiff's vehicle by NRA soldiers. Damages awarded in full with interest.
Facts
The plaintiff, a minor aged 2 years in 1984, was registered as owner of a Toyota Hiace Minibus Registration No. UVA 207, purchased by her father who managed the vehicle as a taxi. On 2 December 1986, the father took the vehicle for brake repair at Nakivubo Road. Two persons wearing greenish gum boots (typical of NRA soldiers) arrested him at gunpoint and took him to Republic House (Army Headquarters). He surrendered the vehicle keys, which were never returned. He was detained at Army Headquarters until 19 December 1986, then transferred to Kampala Central Police Station on allegations of robbery, and released on 22 December 1986 without charge. In February 1987, the father sighted the vehicle at Bugolobi stage bearing NRA numbers and reported to CID Headquarters. The vehicle was never recovered. The father later recovered damages in a separate suit (HCCS No. 722/87) for false imprisonment arising from the same incident.
Issues
- Whether the plaintiff is the owner of motor vehicle Registration No. UVA 207
- Whether the vehicle was lost through acts of NRA soldiers
- Whether NRA soldiers were acting within the scope of their employment
- What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to
Orders
- Judgment for the plaintiff.
- Plaintiff awarded UGX 4,875,000 as the value of the lost vehicle.
- Plaintiff awarded UGX 10,000,000 as lost income from 3 December 1986 to 5 November 1992.
- Plaintiff awarded UGX 500,000 as general damages.
- Total award of UGX 15,375,000 to carry interest at 15% per annum from the date of judgment until payment in full.
- Defendant to pay the taxed costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
- Taxed costs to carry interest at 6% per annum from the date of judgment until payment in full.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (14)
- Traffic and Road Safety Act 1970 s.10(2)
- Traffic and Road Safety Act 1970 s.10(3)
- Traffic and Road Safety Act 1970 s.8
- Traffic and Road Safety Act 1970 s.186(1)
- Traffic and Road Safety Act 1970 s.50(1)
- Traffic and Road Safety Act 1970 s.50(4)
- Traffic and Road Safety Act 1970 s.52(5)
- Traffic and Road Safety Act 1970 s.185(1)
- Traffic and Road Safety Act 1970 s.185(3)
- Traffic and Road Safety Act 1970 s.11(1)
- Traffic and Road Safety Act 1970 s.11(2)
- Land Transfer Act s.2
- Land Transfer Act s.4
- Government Proceedings Act
Cases cited (7)
- Muwonge v Attorney-General [1967] EA
- Lukwago v Attorney-General (Civil Suit No. 1156 of 1983)
- Turyamureeba v Attorney-General (Civil Suit No. 436 of 1986)
- Obwangamoi v Attorney-General (Civil Suit No. 188 of 1986)
- Uganda Commercial Bank v Waswa [1982] HCB
- Okello v Attorney-General (Civil Suit No. 371 of 1987)
- Oryema Vs. UCC
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.