Attorney General and 6 Others v Mulemberi and 7 Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 98 of 2022)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court dismissed an application for stay of execution of a decree granting vacant possession of land to respondents. The court held that stay of execution should not be granted to stay a decree that has never been challenged. Where there is no challenge to the decision sought to be executed, questions arising in the execution process should be determined by the executing court, not through a stay application.
Outcome
Application dismissed; execution to proceed in accordance with court orders
Facts
The applicants sought a stay of execution of a 2016 consent decree that ordered respondents to take immediate possession of land in Kasese District. The decree arose from a long-standing land conflict between the Bakonzo and Basongora communities. The decree also ordered that 3,500 acres be surveyed and allocated to Basongora pastoralists. Applicants argued they could not complete the survey due to COVID-19 lockdowns and that execution should be stayed until survey completion. Respondents had obtained a warrant of vacant possession and served notice requiring applicants to vacate within 90 days. A previous application by respondents for consequential orders (Misc. Application No. 45 of 2020) was dismissed, with Justice Mugabo directing that respondents proceed with execution while the survey was completed. A survey was conducted in October 2022 with both parties present.
Issues
- Whether this application is proper before this Court.
- Whether the applicants' application for stay of execution should be granted.
Orders
- Application for stay of execution dismissed.
- The Registrar shall ensure that execution proceeds in accordance with the orders of court.
- No order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Judicature Act s.33
- Civil Procedure Rules O.43 r.4
- Civil Procedure Rules O.52 rr.1, 2, 3
- Constitution of Uganda art.126(2)(e)
Cases cited (3)
- National Enterprise Corporation v Mukisa Foods (Miscellaneous Application No. 7 of 1998)
- Kyambogo University v Prof. Isaiah Omolo Ndiege (Civil Appeal No. 341 of 2013)
- Teddy Sseezi Cheey and Another v Enos Tumusiime (Civil Application No. 21 of 1996)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.