Home › Case law › Attorney General v Geoffrey Kazinda (Constitutional Appeal No 5 of 2020 Constitutional Application No 01 of 2023 Constitutional Application No 04 of 2024 Constitutional Application No 08 of 2021)
Attorney General v Geoffrey Kazinda (Constitutional Appeal No 5 of 2020 Constitutional Application No 01 of 2023 Constitutional Application No 04 of 2024 Constitutional Application No 08 of 2021)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
A Constitutional Court judgment rendered by only four of the mandatory five judges is a nullity for want of coram and cannot be saved by substantive justice.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Attorney General applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.