Wakilii
HomeCase law › Attorney General v Geoffrey Kazinda (Constitutional Appeal No. 5 of 2020; Constitutional Application No. 01 of 2023; Constitutional Application No. 04 of 2024; Constitutional Appli

Attorney General v Geoffrey Kazinda (Constitutional Appeal No. 5 of 2020; Constitutional Application No. 01 of 2023; Constitutional Application No. 04 of 2024; Constitutional Appli

Court: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Uganda

Legal issues

Constitutional LawCivil ProcedureStatutory Interpretation

About this case

AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.

A Constitutional Court judgment delivered by only four of the five judges required by Article 137(2) is a nullity; substantive justice cannot cure the jurisdictional defect.

Ask Wakilii about this case

Get a cited answer on how Attorney General applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.

Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.