Attorney General v Henry Waibale and Others (Miscellaneous Application No 582 of 2005) (Miscellaneous Application No 582 of 2005)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court held that SI 80 of 2000 applies to pension claims filed after its coming into force, even where the claimants retired before the statutory instrument took effect. The court ruled that Article 254 of the Constitution guarantees pension rights of public officers and enables them to claim unpaid pensions, and that SI 80 of 2000 should be used to determine the claims.
Outcome
SI 80 of 2000 applicable to the pension claims
Facts
The applicants were public officers who retired before SI 80 of 2000 came into force. They filed suit in 2004 claiming unpaid pension benefits. The Attorney General raised the question whether SI 80 of 2000 could apply to officers who retired before its enactment. The suit had been entertained up to the point of judgment.
Issues
- Whether SI 80 of 2000 applies to respondents who retired before its coming into force.
Orders
- SI 80 of 2000 to be applied in determining the claims of the applicants/plaintiffs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- Constitution Article 254
- SI 80 of 2000
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.