Home › Case law › Ayena Odongo v The Attorney General & Anor (Constitutional Petition No. 30 of 2017)
Ayena Odongo v The Attorney General & Anor (Constitutional Petition No. 30 of 2017)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
The judiciary's administrative expenses are charged directly on the Consolidated Fund under article 128(5); funding the judiciary through an Appropriation Act is unconstitutional.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Ayena Odongo applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.