Ayume Kennedy v Attorney General [2018] UGHRC 76
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Tribunal held that UPDF soldiers acting on orders of the District Internal Security Officer beat the complainant, an LC 1 Chairperson who intervened to stop the beating of another person. The beatings constituted torture in violation of Articles 24 and 44(a) of the Constitution. The state was vicariously liable for the soldiers' actions. The complainant was awarded UGX 8,000,000 in general damages.
Outcome
Complaint allowed; complainant awarded damages for torture by state agents
Facts
On 15 June 2008 at approximately 5:30 pm, Ayume Kennedy, an LC 1 Chairperson and nurse at Kulikulinga Health Centre, was informed that the District Internal Security Officer (DISO) and soldiers were beating the caretaker of a late doctor's residence on allegations of theft and rebellion. When Kennedy arrived at the scene and attempted to stop the beating, the DISO put him at gunpoint and beat him with a belt. The DISO then ordered uniformed UPDF soldiers to beat Kennedy with raw green sticks on his back, head, and shoulders. Kennedy sustained injuries including a major bruise on the back of his head measuring 2 cm by 5 cm. He was treated at Yumbe Hospital as an outpatient. Three witnesses corroborated the beating, and medical evidence confirmed the injuries were life-threatening and classified as grievous harm.
Issues
- Whether the Complainant's right to freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment was violated?
- Whether the Respondent is liable?
- Whether there is any remedy available to the Complainant?
Orders
- The Complaint is allowed.
- The Respondent is ordered to pay the Complainant a sum of UGX 8,000,000 as general damages for the violation of his right to freedom from torture as protected under Articles 24 and 44(a) of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995.
- The above total shall attract interest at 10% per annum rate from the date of this decision till payment in full.
- Each party shall bear its own costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (9)
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 Article 24
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 Article 44(a)
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 Article 53(2)
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 Article 221
- Prevention and Prohibition of Torture Act 2012 s.3
- Evidence Act Cap 6 s.100-102
- Government Proceedings Act Cap 77 s.3(1)(a)
- Government Proceedings Act Cap 77 s.3(2)
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 Article 8
Cases cited (12)
- Babyesiza Godfrey v Attorney General (UHRC Complaint No. MBA/015/2008)
- Birigwenkya Godfrey v Attorney General (UHRC Complaint No. 175/2007)
- Kiwalabye Kyaterekera Bonny v Attorney General (UHRC Complaint No. MSK/65/2011)
- Osotraco Limited v Attorney General (HCCS No. 1380 of 1986)
- Attorney General v Salvatori Abuki (Constitutional Appeal No. 1 of 1998)
- Mohammed Draku v Attorney General & Kajoingi Andrew (UHRC Complaint No. G/88/2005)
- Muwonge v Attorney General (1967) EA 7
- Charles Harry Twagira v Attorney General & Samuel Kyomukama (HCCS No. 836 of 2006)
- Ojul P'Otobi v Attorney General (UHRC Complaint No. G/168/2003)
- Kones Mohammed v Attorney General (UHRC Complaint No. JJ/764/2006)
- Pte Enock Ngomya v Attorney General (UHRC Complaint No. 405/2004)
- Laber Luwaya Michael v Attorney General & Major Anywar Augustine (UHRC Complaint No. G/68/2005)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.