Baguma t/a Panache Associates v Karuma (CIVIL SUIT NO. 002 OF 2015)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the tenant's failure to pay rent for five months while occupying and conducting business on the premises constituted fundamental breach of the tenancy agreement, notwithstanding the landlord's continued partial occupation. The tenant's continued occupation despite the landlord's presence constituted implied waiver of the right to quiet enjoyment, precluding reliance on that breach. The landlord's counterclaim for rent arrears and utility bills was granted. Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs.
Outcome
Plaintiff's suit dismissed; defendant's counterclaim granted with monetary awards and costs
Facts
On 24 March 2014, the parties executed a tenancy agreement for premises on plots 9350 and 9351, Block 185, Kira-Wakiso, commencing 1 April 2014 for five years at monthly rent of UGX 5,000,000 (later increasing). The tenant took occupation in April 2014 but never paid rent. The landlord did not vacate part of the premises and continued using utilities and subletting the swimming pool to Greenhill Academy. The tenant operated business on the premises until 23 August 2014 when the landlord exercised right of re-entry after five months of non-payment, confiscating the tenant's business items. The tenant sued for breach of contract, loss of income, and return of items. The landlord counterclaimed for rent arrears of UGX 23,000,000, utility bills of UGX 932,612, and general damages.
Issues
- Whether there was any breach of the agreement by the parties.
- What remedies are available to the parties.
Orders
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs.
- Plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant outstanding rent arrears of UGX 23,000,000.
- Plaintiff ordered to pay 80% of UGX 932,612 in unpaid utility bills.
- Defendant awarded general damages of UGX 10,000,000.
- Defendant awarded interest at 20% per annum from date of filing suit until payment in full.
- Defendant awarded costs of the counterclaim.
- Defendant to return confiscated items (tools of trade) to plaintiff upon satisfaction in full of this judgment.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (4)
Cases cited (6)
- Makula International Ltd v His Eminence Cardinal Nsubuga and Another [1982] HCB 11
- Male Mabirizi and 7 Others v Attorney General (Constitutional Appeal No. 01 of 2018)
- Kivumbi Bashir v Ali Muyangu and Another (Civil Appeal No. 11 of 2016)
- Agri-Industrial Management Agency Ltd v Kayonza Growers Tea Factory Ltd and Another (HCCS No. 819 of 2004)
- Three Way Shipping Services (Group) Ltd v China Chongqing International Construction Corporation (HCCS No. 538 of 2005)
- Ouma v Nairobi City Council [1976] KLR 298
Cases citing this judgment (7)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
- Barasa Thomas v Ojiambo Pascal (Civil Appeal No. 3 of 2021)
- Oluka v Mugoda & Another (Civil Appeal 64 of 2016)
- Bukenya v Nakamya & 3 Others (Miscellaneous Application 68 of 2024)
- Magadu and Another v Kiiza (Civil Appeal 63 of 2020)
- Mbabazi v Kabakumba and Another (Miscellaneous Application 177 of 2022)
- Onyait v Okiror (HCMA 154 of 2022)
- Aupal Kokas v Aisu Popuras (Miscellaneous Application No. 52 of 2022)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.