Bahimbisomwe v Rwabinubi (Civil Reference 4 of 2009)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that Rule 21(2) of the Supreme Court Rules on court vacation is directory not mandatory, so hearing an extension-of-time application during vacation did not invalidate the ruling.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Bahimbisomwe applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.