Bainomugisha Josephine v Efc (U) Ltd (Miscellaneous Application No. 821 of 2016)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Court granted temporary injunction restraining respondent lender from selling applicant's properties pending determination of civil suit challenging mortgage enforcement. Applicant established prima facie case that matrimonial home was not pledged as collateral for current loan and demonstrated risk of irreparable harm. Injunction conditional on applicant depositing 30% of forced sale value or outstanding amount within 30 days.
Outcome
Temporary injunction granted pending trial with condition of security deposit
Facts
Applicant obtained credit facility of UGX 12,000,000 from respondent lender in April 2015, pledging land at Nankaba and chattels as security. Applicant claimed she had paid off earlier loan secured on her matrimonial home at Bulamu and recovered those documents. Applicant alleged she had not defaulted on current loan and last paid installment on 30 July 2016. On 11 August 2016, respondent published notice of sale of both properties including the matrimonial home. On 15 August 2016, applicant was served notice to vacate matrimonial home. Respondent claimed applicant had accepted loan of UGX 12,000,000 secured on both properties and had defaulted from October 2015. Applicant filed civil suit 627 of 2016 challenging the mortgage enforcement and brought this application for temporary injunction.
Issues
- Whether this is a proper case for grant of an order for a temporary injunction
Orders
- Temporary injunction granted restraining the respondent from evicting the applicant and selling the applicant's property comprised in customary land at Bulamu, Kasangati, LC 1 Nangabo sub county Wakiso District and land comprised in Bulemezi Block 17 Plot 270 land at Nankaba pending the disposal of the main suit.
- Injunction granted on condition that the applicant deposits 30% of the forced sale value of the mortgaged property or outstanding amount whichever is higher pending the determination of the main suit.
- Deposit must be made within 30 days from this ruling, failure of which the respondent may proceed with recovery processes provided under the Mortgage Act.
- Costs shall be in the cause.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (10)
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Civil Procedure Act s.27
- Mortgage Act s.33
- Mortgage Act s.34
- Mortgage Act s.36
- Civil Procedure Rules O.41 r.1
- Civil Procedure Rules O.41 r.2
- Civil Procedure Rules O.41 r.9
- Judicature Act s.37
- Mortgage Regulations 2012 reg.13
Cases cited (7)
- Kiyimba Kaggwa v Haji Abdu Nasser Katende (1985) HCBI 43
- GAPCO Uganda Ltd v Kaweesa (Miscellaneous Application No. 269 of 2013)
- Ganafa Peter Kisawuzi v DFCU Bank Limited (Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 64 of 2016)
- Robert Karmma v Hotel International (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 8 of 1990)
- American Cyanamid v Ethicon [1975] ALL ER 504
- GAPCO Uganda Ltd v Kaweesa Badru & Anor (Miscellaneous Application No. 259 of 2013)
- Amos Rwamashodi v Gatrida Nalwoga & Anor (Miscellaneous Application No. 774 of 2011)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.