Balikudembe & Ors v Jjagwe (Misc. Applic. No. 976 of 2012)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the High Court Land Division is not the proper forum for granting letters of administration to the estate of a deceased person — such applications must be brought before the Family Division. The application was dismissed as brought before the wrong forum. The court further found the applicants' affidavit in rejoinder to be incurably defective for failing to state the date and place where it was sworn, in violation of section 6 of the Oaths Act.
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Facts
The applicants brought an application under section 222 of the Succession Act and Order 24 rules 4 and 12 of the Civil Procedure Rules, seeking orders for the respondent to be granted letters of administration to the estate of the late Gertrude Nambooze for purposes of the main suit (Land Claim No. 210 of 2009), and thereafter to be made a party to the suit as legal representative of the deceased. The respondent opposed the application, denying any obligation to act as administrator and asserting ownership of the disputed land. The applicants' affidavit in rejoinder was not dated and did not state the place where it was sworn.
Issues
- Whether the High Court Land Division has jurisdiction to grant letters of administration to the estate of a deceased person.
- Whether an affidavit in rejoinder not bearing a date or place where it was sworn complies with the Oaths Act and is admissible.
- Whether the respondent can be compelled to act as legal representative of a deceased person.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (9)
- Succession Act s.222
- Civil Procedure Rules O.24 r.4
- Civil Procedure Rules O.24 r.12
- Civil Procedure Rules O.24 r.4(3)
- Succession Act s.191
- Succession Act s.192
- Administrator General's Act s.4
- Judicature Act s.14(1)
- Oaths Act s.6
Cases cited (2)
- Bevan v Houldworth [1948] 1 All ER 273
- Teddy Namazzi v Anne Sibo (1986) HCB 58
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.