Wakilii

Baliruno v Central Broadcasting Services (CBS) (Labour Dispute Reference 92 of 2020)

Industrial Court · [2023] UGIC 102 · 2023 Preliminary Objection Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Preliminary objection to admissibility of documentary evidence in labour dispute reference
Decision
Preliminary objection dismissed; matter to proceed to hearing on the merits

Observed later treatment

Cited — treatment unverified cited in 2 (treatment unverified) Sequitur — Uganda’s citator · Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

No adverse treatment recorded Cited 2 times with no adverse treatment recorded; not yet tested on the merits. Citations rising — 3 citing cases on record, 3 in the most recent three data years. Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — a deterministic signal, not legal advice.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The Industrial Court is not bound by strict rules of evidence under Section 18 of the Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act 2006. Documents objected to on grounds of being photocopies or not addressed to the witness may be admitted at the preliminary stage, with their authenticity, credibility, and reliability to be tested in cross-examination and evaluated later. The preliminary objection to admissibility was overruled and the contested documents were admitted in evidence.

Outcome

Preliminary objection dismissed; matter to proceed to hearing on the merits

Facts

The Claimant brought a labour dispute reference against the Respondent. At the hearing, the Respondent's counsel objected to the admissibility of five of the Claimant's documents on the grounds that they were photocopies not covered by exceptions in Section 46 of the Evidence Act, that some documents were not addressed to the Claimant, and that once admissibility is contested, documents cannot be admitted for identification. The Claimant's counsel submitted that the documents were relevant and that the Claimant could be cross-examined. The Court was required to determine whether the contested documents should be admitted in evidence.

Issues

  1. Whether photocopied documents not falling within the exceptions in Section 46 of the Evidence Act are admissible in Industrial Court proceedings.
  2. Whether documents not addressed to the witness or authored by the witness are admissible in Industrial Court proceedings.
  3. Whether the Industrial Court is bound by the strict rules of evidence applicable to civil proceedings.

Orders

  • Preliminary objection overruled.
  • CEX1, CEX2, CEX4, CEX7, and CEX9 admitted in evidence and marked CID1, CID2, CID4, CID7 and CID9.
  • Claim set down for hearing.

Rules and key headnotes

Employment & Labour — Industrial Court Procedure — Rules of Evidence — Applicability of Evidence Act
Under Section 18 of the Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act 2006, the Industrial Court is not bound by the rules of evidence applicable to civil proceedings, and the legislature intended to provide for a less formal approach to labour justice with a less technically legalistic approach to evidence.
Evidence — Admissibility — Documentary Evidence — Photocopies and Secondary Evidence in Labour Proceedings
In Industrial Court proceedings, documents objected to on grounds of being photocopies or not falling within the exceptions in Section 62 of the Evidence Act should not be rejected at the preliminary stage of trial; the Court is entitled to receive evidence and determine its relevance, materiality, and weight, with authenticity, credibility, and reliability to be tested in cross-examination.
Evidence — Admissibility — Effect of Admission — Distinction Between Admission and Proof
The admission of a document in evidence does not affirm its legality or authenticity; admission is subject to proof of its evidential worth, which entails a determination of its authenticity and legality at a later stage of trial.
Civil Procedure — Constitutional Principles — Substantive Justice Without Undue Regard to Technicalities
The informal approach to evidence in the Industrial Court is rooted in social equity in administering labour justice and is expressive of the constitutional precept of administering substantive justice without undue regard to technicalities as set out in Article 126(2)(e) of the 1995 Constitution.

Legislation cited (5)

Cases cited (7)

  • Nathan Bisaso v Ssenyonga & Another (Civil Suit No. 750 of 2017)
  • Odongo Ochama Hussein v Abdul Rajabi (HCCA No. 19 of 2018)
  • Tumushabe & Another v Anglo African Ltd & Another (Civil Appeal No. 38 of 1997)
  • Lubega Moses & 5 Others v Roofings Uganda Ltd (Labour Dispute Reference No. 166 of 2020)
  • Moro Charles v Greenhill Secondary School (Labour Dispute Reference No. 10 of 2021)
  • Southern Sun Hotels (Pty) Ltd v SA Commercial Catering & Allied Works Union and Another [2000] 21, IU 1315 (LAC)
  • Jennifer Nsubuga v Michael Mukundane and Another (Civil Appeal No. 208 of 2018)

Cases citing this judgment (2)

How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Baliruno_v_Central_Broadcasting_Services_(CBS)_(Labour_Dispute_Reference_92_of_2020)_[2023]_UGIC_102_(24_May_2023)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.