Baluku Suraimani (Suing through his lawful attorney)& Anor v Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited (Complaint Number EDT 48 of 2018)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The tribunal struck out the complaint for lack of locus standi. Where a complainant sues through a power of attorney, the power of attorney document must be attached to the complaint as required by Order 7 Rule 14 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Failure to attach the document renders the complaint incompetent and unsustainable. The tribunal also declined to grant an adjournment by letter where counsel failed to provide sufficient details of the case or inform opposing counsel of his absence.
Outcome
Complaint struck out for lack of locus standi
Facts
Baluku Suraiman, suing through his attorney Thembo Enock, filed a complaint against Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Ltd before the Electricity Disputes Tribunal. When the matter came up for hearing, counsel for the complainant (Mr. Guma) was absent, having sent a letter dated 22 May 2018 seeking an adjournment on grounds that he was attending High Court in Mbarara. The complainant's attorney Thembo Enock was also absent. Counsel for the respondent opposed the adjournment and raised a preliminary objection that no power of attorney had been attached to the complaint as required by Order 7 Rule 14 of the Civil Procedure Rules. During the proceedings, Baluku Sulaiman appeared but did not explain the absence of his attorney or whether the power of attorney had been withdrawn.
Issues
- Whether the tribunal should grant an adjournment based on counsel's letter indicating attendance at High Court in Mbarara.
- Whether the complaint is competent where the complainant sues through a power of attorney but fails to attach the power of attorney document as required by Order 7 Rule 14 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Orders
- Complaint struck out with costs to the Respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
Cases cited (2)
- John Sebataana v Abanenamer Yorokamu and Francis Lwanga (HCCS No. 99 of 2005)
- Fakrudin Vallibhai Kapasi v Kampala District Land Board and Another (HCC No. 570 of 2015)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.