Baluku v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 10 of 2017)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Mathematically precise deduction of remand time under Article 23(8) was not required before Rwabugande (2017); the 22-year robbery sentence was legal and the appeal dismissed.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Baluku applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.