Bamu Partners and Auctioneers v Attorney General (Civil Appeal 3 of 2002)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that a bailiff claiming fees for attaching shares must prove compliance with Order 19 r 43; absent a served prohibitory order, the appeal failed.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Bamu Partners and Auctioneers applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.